118 Ada Kwiatkowska
State of research: the expression of architecture
exploring the dimension of time
The formulation of a special and general theory of rela-
tivity by Albert Einstein had inuence not only on the sci-
ence at the beginning of 20
th
century, but also on the culture
and art. Time and space were combined in the concept of
four-dimensional space-time and related to the phenomenon
of electromagnetism, which had its further consequences,
which led to the creation of new theories in the eld of not
only physics but also the theory of the perception of reality
by the human brain. Frank Wilczek compares this discovery
to changing the way of seeing an image in painting from
one xed perspective to seeing it from dierent perspectives
[12]. The change of perspectives causes the perception of
the image to dier in many aspects between dierent points
of view. This involves phenomena such as anamorphosis,
which is the distortion of the spatial structure of an image
by the movement of the observer in the metric eld, and
anachromosis – the modication of the colour of an image
by the movement of a light beam while keeping its spatial
structure unchanged. And it is precisely this variation in the
perception of the image, resulting from the new concept of
space in relation to time and movement, that has fascinated
artists and architects most since the discovery of the theory
of relativity.
The space of possibilities is an operating simulation
model of space-time, based on the exploration of muta-
bility of basic features of its internal structures and trans-
formation of its attributes by using algorithms of comput-
er programmes. Time plays the key role in the space of
possibilities. According to Brian Greene [13], to illustrate
the structure of space-time, one can use the metaphor of
a frozen river, in which space is a channel lled with ice,
and time is a sequence of cut ice slices, following one after
the other, like the frames of a motion picture. This meta-
phorical denition can be transferred to the description of
an architectural model of the space-time in the meaning
of a dynamic sequence of views of an architectural form,
following one after the another with the observer’s move-
ment, or it can signify a sequence of dynamic transforma-
tions of a spatial structure under the inuence of various
forces acting on it in space-time.
According to Dean Buonomano’s classication [14],
there are two basic currents in dening the ontological
nature of time, such as presentism and eternalism. In the
concept of presentism, only the present is real. It means
that the visualization of an architectural object in three-di-
mensional space in the present time is a representative im-
age of form as an expression of here and now. The change
of point of view along with the movement of the observer
entails the need to create more images and simultaneously
initiate new realities, because in the concept of presentism
there are no such phenomena as before and after. Only the
approach of eternalism, incorporating the concepts of past
and future as well as before and after, enables the expres-
sion of space-time continuity by dening places in time, in
other words, by spatializing of the time. The idea of eter-
nalism is related to the perception of spatial structures as
dynamic systems, being in motion and related to places in
time. Motion pictures are the best representations of archi-
tectural objects because they imitate the way the human
brain perceives and reconstructs the appearance of reality.
Finding an appropriate and stimulating way of expres-
sing time in architecture is a certain challenge, because
in the traditional understanding of architecture, the spa-
tial dimension dominates over the temporal one. A simi-
lar situation took place in visual arts – in painting, which
showed the real world or imagined by artists in static mo-
tionless pictures, existing outside of time or expressing at
most the idea of abstract time.
Wassily Kandinsky, the vanguard artist representing
abstract modern art at the beginning of 20
th
century in-
troduced the concept of time to art theory. As he wrote in
his book Point and Line to Plane [15], people believed for
ages that paintings are only dipped in space, while music
happens in time, which is contrary to scientic discover-
ies. The image is an act of taking place in time, both in the
aspect of its creation by the artist and its perception by the
observer. All elements of the paintings, from point to line
to surface, are characterised by a specic length of time.
Translation of visual composition into musical one, and
vice versa, is possible because they constitute the unity,
resulting from their physical wave characteristics (image
– expression of light wave, music – sound wave) and from
the similarity of wave propagation in space-time. Kandin-
sky, in the essay On Abstract Theatre Synthesis, postu-
lated the necessity of integration of all arts “architecture,
painting, sculpture, music, dance and poetry” [2, p. 104],
and subordinating them to a common language of expres-
sion and common rules of composition in space-time.
Time and movement played the key roles in the theater
performances of Oskar Schlemmer and Kandinsky, who
were the creators of avant-garde performances on the the-
ater stage of the Bauhaus School of Architecture. Schlem-
mer implemented the concept of an abstract performative
show as an expression of constructivist dance, in which
body movements, costumes and music represented dy-
namic harmony between man, space and time (e.g. Figu-
ral Cabinet, Triadic Ballet, Yellow Sequence, Pink Sequ-
ence [2]), and the concept of abstract theatrical synthesis
based on the analysis of the elementary components of
dance composition and choreography, which was to lead
to the systematization of basic geometric forms and the
principles of composition of motion pictures (e.g. Form
dance, Gesture dance, Space dance, Scenery dance, Box
Promenade [2]). These concepts were partly inuenced by
the art theories of Kandinsky, Paul Klee and El Lissitzky.
Kandinsky’s theater performances, which are a mani-
festation of synthetic art that unites all elds of art, were
created using such means of expression as abstract forms,
colors, words, sounds, music and dance gures, stimula-
ting all the senses of the performers and viewers of these
performances (e.g. The Yellow Sound, The Green Sound,
Black and White, The Violet Curtain [2]). Performances
of this author showed the dynamic and time-varying na-
ture of architectural forms, resulting from the movements
of spatial objects, and the dynamic and time-varying na-
ture of the perception of these forms, resulting from the
movement of the observer. Kandinsky’s artistic ideas, his