8 Bethania Barbosa B. de Souza
granting him unlimited freedom in the conceptual realm.
The impetus behind these transgressions emerged from
the preceding three decades, during which society under-
went transitions never before imagined, and continued to.
Drastic changes encompassing every eld of knowledge
appeared in every area of society: science, technology,
culture, economics, communications, arts, etc. Fields
of knowledge related to the role of cause and effect ad-
vanced, and fed on each other, in an evolutionary process
subjecting humanity to a veritable whirlwind of rapid de-
velopment and great complexity.
Thus, every work of art, including that in question –
the artist’s book – reect the aesthetic dynamics of the
ideological and technical period during which it was pro-
duced, revealing, with or without the artist’s consent, his
consciousness, his conception of the world, his aesthetics
and the nature of his time. Much of the historical juncture
we now face is a consequence of globalisation, a dynamic
resulting from the scientic and technological advances
mentioned above. Globalisation reveals to us the hetero-
geneous aspects of the world, which, with the passage of
time, often become homogeneous, as we can easily per-
ceive in the most recent architectural constructions, when
we visit a big city, notice the people’s attire, their works of
art, or their codes and conduct.
Artistʼs books in printmaking evolution
produced by technical advances
and transdisciplinarity
Until the early 20
th
century these theoretical, artistic
and procedural codes were well demarcated, providing the
artist with a clear understanding of the knowledge that he
was to master in order to carry out his aesthetic/plastic
project, whatever it might be. With globalisation, and ad-
vances in new technologies, the technical procedures that
form part of the development of an artistic creation have
changed considerably.
The consequences of globalisation and transdiscipli-
narity also include the immediacy with which information
and knowledge are transmitted, the loss of borders, migra-
tory movements, the dissolution of space/time limits, etc.,
aspects present in the social reality and disciplines of the
different elds of knowledge. In the same way, these con-
sequences are reected in the transdisciplinary processes
employed in the artist’s book, in both its conceptual and
procedural contexts.
In the production of an artist’s book, it may be gener-
ally observed that, in relation to the development of aes-
thetic/plastic work, images are increasingly manipulated,
captured, metamorphosed, and digitalised, generating
a constructive process of fragmented, non-linear images
in various disciplines; with a result, nevertheless, of unity,
an entity, on the whole, a complex and hybrid transdis-
ciplinary process. In this procedural form of production
of the artist’s book, the transdisciplinary process does not
spurn the tradition of artistic procedure, as this is an essen-
tial aspect of the transdisciplinary process.
As we can appreciate in this image, the artist has ma-
nipulated, captured, metamorphosed and digitalised it, in
a process yielding a fragmented image, bridging the histo-
ry of art and engraving, but with a result of unity, an entity
resulting from a transdisciplinary process.
These are aspects that do not imply a rejection or in-
validation of traditional artistic techniques. Rather, the
artist’s book comes to occupy a privileged place for ex-
perimentation and the creation of new concepts existing
alongside pre-existing ones.
As we can see: the past, the present and the future, as-
sociated with transdisciplinary processes, spark the art-
ist’s interest in the transformative potential of the creative
and procedural aspects available, capable of producing
something superior.
In this way, the images developed by any aesthetic/
plastic activity may proceed from different elds and ar-
eas of knowledge, such as: drawing, photography, sculp-
ture, painting, metrics, architecture, medicine, biology,
zoology, physics, chemistry, astronomy, geology, etc.,
providing a benet never before imagined in artistic aes-
thetics: enabling their evolution.
Therefore, the artist has fused different images from
areas or elds of knowledge that once existed separately,
combining or transforming them out of a desire to gener-
ate new structures, objects, or, in our case, images. That
is, in the process of aesthetic/plastic creation the ways of
expressing, interpreting and understanding the creative
process are no longer rooted in a specic discipline or
technique, isolated from other disciplines, as used to be
the case. On the contrary, we nd ourselves with the op-
portunity to transgress the limits of technique and, con-
sequently, their respective restrictions. This process of
transgression and transformation enriches the creative
process, broadening creative horizons. Therefore, great
achievements are possible when one makes use of his
knowledge of his area, but while observing its problems
from different points of view, giving him a perspective
that draws on other elds of knowledge.
It is clear that the individual can only transgress the
boundaries of the technical procedures of a particular dis-
cipline if he understands them. With knowledge, he may
be able to solve their internal problems, but this will not
sufce to enrich them. It is only from a different perspec-
tive that he can expand his solution and creation possibil-
ities, making the discipline to which he is dedicated in-
creasingly transdisciplinary, with coexisting fundamental
concepts of hybridisation, contamination, appropriation,
miscegenation, crossing, etc.
The stress on transdisciplinary processes in aesthet-
ic/plastic production reects the frenetic era in which
we live, with a whole avalanche of factors affecting our
lives, socially, technologically, psychologically and onto-
logically, both with regard to contemporary concepts and
techniques and traditional ones.
These processes are generators of elements that are
borrowed, appropriations, contaminations and crosses
between the technical procedures and the aesthetic to be
developed, as they create forums for the coexistence of
known languages, engendering a perception of these ob-
jects totally differentiated from the way we perceive and
relate to traditional media or techniques.