
Gothic St Lawrence Church in Gniezno and its interwar expansion 45
seum relic – it must, in many cases, undergo successive
alterations, extensions, and additions (1912/1913, 6). In
the case of enlargement […], of utility buildings requir-
ing expansion, the modern additions should be executed in
such a way as to harmonize artistically with the old struc-
ture – yet without obscuring the distinction between the
new and the old (Muczkowski 1912, 21).
The above instructions were implemented in many proj-
ects. In a broad survey of interwar undertakings, Paweł
Dettlo observed that, indeed, one of the most common
solutions employed in the enlargement of historic church-
es was to stylistically dierentiate the new parts from the
old (2006, 372). For Gothic churches, it was nearly standard
practice to design the extensions in a Baroque idiom (eg.
Kazanice, Jeżewo, Wojnicz). Dettlo also emphasizes that
the choice of architectural style may have been inuenced
by the widespread perception of Baroque as a “Polish”
style, particularly in the territories of the former Prussian
partition (Dettlo 2006, 374). The expansion of St Law-
rence’s Church in Gniezno thus ts into a broader formal
and ideological context
19
.
Michałowski valued the historical signicance of the
monument and submitted his design proposals for consul-
tation with the appropriate conservation authorities. After
preparing the full set of design drawings, in a letter of 10
December 1924 he informed the parish priest of Gniezno:
[…] Yesterday I conferred with the Provincial Conserva-
tor, Dr Pajzderski
20
; he has no objections and accepts the
project, with only one request – that the main entrance to
the tower be simplied. With regard to the planned raising
of the tower, a year before the detailed design was drawn
up – on 27 February 1935 – the architect wrote: […] the
inclusion [of the tower superstructure] is now necessary in
order to secure the conservator’s approval. In the available
sources, there is no information as to why the project to
raise the tower was abandoned. Perhaps the general objec-
tive of conservation was given precedence over the idea
of stylistic coherence and compositional proportionality,
in order to […] preserve monuments in a state as little al-
tered as possible, in the most authentic condition
21
(Tom-
kowicz 1912, 23). Perhaps to Gniezno came the echoes of
the debate that arose around the words of Father Zygmunt
Baranowski […] For historical reasons, one may preserve
a mixture of styles; yet in the name of what slogans are
Baroque additions imposed today upon Gothic churches?
Is it only the Baroque that is granted the right to exist in
our country? Is pure Gothic truly so intolerable that it
must be curtailed and supplemented with Baroque forms?
(1930, 6). It is also possible that other, e.g., nancial, rea-
sons led to the abandonment of the project. Later dating of
the detailed project of the tower and its spire (1936) and
the omission of the works associated with it from the cost
estimate from 1935 indicate that these plans were supposed
19
It is worth mentioning here that its “baroquication” (introduced in
the form of a new gable) began before the extension in the 1930s (cf. fn. 7).
20
Nikodem Pajzderski (1882–1940) heritage conservator of the
Poznań (from 1919) and Pomerania (from 1923) voivodships.
21
Although, as Ewa Łużyniecka (2013, 43) observes, the unambig-
uous denition of authenticity remains problematic to this day.
to be carried out at a later stage. Given that Michałowski
intended to consult with the conservation ocer regarding
the project with the preliminarily sketched elevated tower
in 1935, and developed detailed solutions toward the end
of 1936, it is dicult to imagine that he did not receive
the conservator’s approval. Moreover, all the boards of the
project approved by the regional authorities in 1935, fea-
turing the tower (view, cross-section, elevations), present
it in its elevated form. It is, therefore, plausible that it was
precisely economic reasons that prevented the project from
being carried out before the outbreak of the World War II
22
.
Michałowski approached church design in a comprehen-
sive manner. That is, apart from the architectural cencept,
he prepared drawings of multiple elements of the church
furnishing. The letter of 25 November 1937 concerning,
nota bene, the request for the payment of the architect’s fee,
contains an enumeration of all the design works he executed
for the parish. Besides the projects of the church expansion
and the unrealized elevation of the tower the works also in-
cluded: altar in the upper chapel, the main altar, altar for the
Chapel of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, side altar in the tran-
sept, confessional, choir stalls, galleries, throne, the sacristy
doorframe, and pews. Furthermore, the rectory, designed in
the manor-house style, along with the garden, and the fence
surrounding the church and the square.
A considerate number of the objects mentioned above
was produced before the war, albeit not in the full scope.
Currently, a hundred years after the rst version of the proj-
ect was created, Michałowski’s plans are being implement-
ed as part of the renovation of the church.
An unusually interesting functional solution proposed
by Michałowski was the creation of a baptismal chapel lo-
cated in the corner between the chancel and the left side-
nave, linked to both of the aforementioned spaces by open
arcades. During the service, the priest could approach the
baptismal font directly from the chancel, while the candi-
dates for baptism would come up from the nave. Presently
the arcades are bricked up and the space intended for the un-
realized chapel is taken up by a utility room (Fig. 10). Plans
have been drawn up to open the arcades and implement Mi-
chałowski’s concept.
Another unconventional solution proposed by Micha-
łow ski was the arrangement of the area above the baptys-
mal chapel. It was designed as a gallery, open through ar-
cades to the presbytery and the nave, intended to function
as an additional chapel. A two-sided altar was designed for
it, facing the nave on one side and the chapel’s interior on
the other. The altar was created and placed in the previosuly
designated location. The architectural detail, however, was
not executed – namely the metal balustrade securing the
arcades of the gallery, nor the balustrade along the stairs
leading to the chapel, whose course, moreover, was giv-
en a slightly dierent alignment than that foreseen in the
design. At present, the elements of architectural detail are
to be carried out in accordance with the design based on
Michałowski’s concept. It is also planned to complete the
22
A few years earlier – in 1930 – Michałowski developed a design
for adding a Neo-Baroque tower to the Gothic body of the church in
Kłecko, and this concept was realized.