40 Austensean Stanislaus Lumunon
the original altar is preserved (Congregation for Divine
Worship… 2003). Despite this, the implementation of the
post-conciliar reforms in many existing churches, particu-
larly during the 1960s and 1970s, was frequently charac-
terised by interventions that exceeded these prescriptions.
As Jonová (2017) has documented, heritage artworks and
furnishings were removed, sold, or destroyed across multi-
ple European contexts in the decades following the Coun-
cil. Similarly, De Jong and Marcello (2019) have observed
comparable patterns of excessive adaptation in Australian
Catholic churches, where original liturgical furnishings
were discarded rather than integrated into the reformed li-
turgical space.
The spatial focus of these adaptations in pre-conciliar
churches was primarily the presbytery, particularly the area
surrounding the main altar. The side or minor altars also
became targets if their location was close to the new altar
versus populum (Keere, Plevoet and Goyvaerts 2020). Key
interventions typically included: the introduction of a new
altar versus populum; the installation of a xed ambo; the
reconguration of the celebrant’s chair; and the removal
of architectural elements demarcating the sanctuary from
the nave, such as the altar rail and rood screen. The alter-
ation or demolition of the existing altars, including side or
minor altars (votive altars) dedicated to specic saints or
devotional practices, was also widespread, though not uni-
versally so. Scholars including Skaggs (2015) and McNa-
mara (2009) have identied three broadly distinguishable
models of post-conciliar adaptation: minimal intervention
(preserving existing furnishings while adding new liturgi-
cal elements); moderate adaptation (selective recongura-
tion); and radical transformation (demolition and complete
redesign of the presbytery). The case of the Sacred Heart of
Jesus Church in Tomohon, as analysed in this study, corre-
sponds to the third category.
Beyond the European context, the implementation of
post-conciliar liturgical reforms in colonial and post-co-
lonial religious buildings in Southeast Asia presents par-
ticular challenges, as these structures combine the architec-
tural heritage of the colonising culture with the devotional
and cultural specicities of the local Catholic community
(Phan 2005). The Sacred Heart of Jesus Church in Tomo-
hon represents such a case: a Dutch Indies church, built in
neo-Gothic style, which underwent radical post-conciliar
adaptation in a regional context without established conser-
vation frameworks or specialist oversight. Research specif-
ically addressing this category of buildings remains limit-
ed, reinforcing the scholarly relevance of the present study.
State of research
Academic research specically addressing the Sacred
Heart of Jesus Church in Tomohon is extremely limited.
The earliest scholarly work identied is Alberta Mantiri’s
thesis (Mantiri, Warouw and Waani 2021), which examines
the building within the context of Dutch Indies architectur-
al heritage in the Tomohon area and assesses its potential
for cultural heritage designation. The study focuses pri-
marily on the exterior architectural style and urban context
and does not address the interior liturgical history or the
post-conciliar transformations of the presbytery. The au
-
thor’s two studies on the same case study have examined
dierent but complementary aspects of the church’s archi-
tectural character. The rst focused on the adaptation of the
historic building to the tropical highland climate (Lumu-
non, Pasla and Prijadi 2025), while the second, published
in 2026, examined its Neo-Gothic architectural elements
through a variable-based comparative analysis against es-
tablished Dutch and European references (Lumunon, Gosal
and Hasanah 2026). No previous study has examined the
history of the church’s altars, their removal, or the process
and consequences of liturgical adaptation within this spe-
cic building. Therefore, the present study responds to an
identiable research gap by examining the spatial and li-
turgical transformation of a Dutch Indies church within its
historical and cultural context.
In parallel, a substantial body of scholarship has emerged,
primarily in European contexts, addressing the challenge of
reconciling post-conciliar liturgical requirements with the
conservation of historically signicant church interiors.
Among the most notable contributions are the design and
research studies by Giovanni Carbonara for the Basilica di
Santa Maria in Domnica, Rome (Englen 2003), and Calo-
gero Bellanca’s research and design proposal for the Chie-
sa di San Nicola dei Lorenesi, Rome (Bellanca, Muratore
2009). Both studies exemplify an approach of minimal li-
turgical intervention by introducing required elements such
as the altar versus populum and the ambo without altering
or removing the existing historical furnishings. Daniela
Concas (2005) has additionally examined guidelines for
liturgical adaptation in spaces for Eucharistic celebration
in Italian churches, providing a methodological framework
for balancing conservation with liturgical functionality.
These European case studies demonstrate the viability
of a minimum-intervention approach and provide method-
ological precedents for the present study. However, they
operate within well-established European conservation
frameworks, notably the Italian legislative framework for
the protection of cultural heritage in churches, and address
buildings of a dierent historical periods and architectural
characters, ranging from Early Christian Roman basilicas
to Baroque churches. These buildings dier signicantly
from the Dutch East Indies neo-Gothic church examined
here. No comparable study has been conducted for Dutch
Indies-era Catholic churches in Indonesia, where the in-
tersection of Dutch Jesuit mission heritage, post-conciliar
reform, and emerging local heritage conservation frame-
works creates a distinct set of challenges.
Literature specically addressing the conservation and
re construction of liturgical furnishings in scenarios where
the original furnishings have been removed and only frag-
mentary physical evidence remains is particularly scarce.
Bellanca’s methodological works (Bellanca, Muratore
2009;
Bellanca 2011) provide relevant frameworks for ap-
proaching the restoration of historic ecclesiastical interiors.
However, the scholarly literature does not yet adequately
address scenarios such as the one in Tomohon where the
original furnishings have been removed and only fragmen-
tary physical evidence remains, necessitating a combined
archival and physical reconstruction approach.