Correlations and statistical analyses of user preference assessment in participatory design of healthcare facilities
173
fort and well-being of patients, depending on socio-de-
mographic and other conditions, such as waiting times for
registra
tion and medical examination, and, above all, pa-
tients’ ex pectations of the characteristics of the built space.
The con clusions of the described research demonstrate the
applica bility of statistical methods in the pre-design evalua-
tion process of the built space of healthcare facilities.
Summary
Both case studies presented above used convergent sta-
tistical methods. The aim was to create project recommen-
dations based on reliable data.
A limitation of the conducted studies, but also of simi-
lar ones, is usually the so-called institutional barriers, often
the fear of evaluation and possible detection of irregulari-
ties, sometimes simply the reluctance to introduce research
teams evaluating space and functional-spatial solutions into
the constructed healthcare facility.
The life cycle of a building consists of stages that last
from several months to several tens or hundreds of years
(Niezabitowska 2004). For the creation of space quality in
architecture, by far the most important is the planning and
programming phase of a building, and then the actual archi-
tectural design, because it is at the planning and program-
ming stage of an investment that decisions are made relating
to, for example, the choice of location for the building (in
the case of a new hospital) and the creation of a functional
programme begins, which is of key importance for the qual-
ity of the space designed later.
Consequently, it is important from the users’ point of
view to programme healthcare buildings properly and com-
prehensively, based on qualitative studies for buildings and
qualitative assessments for buildings with similar functional
programmes.
To this end, during the programming stage of an invest-
ment, whether it involves a new hospital or the expansion,
renovation or modernisation of an existing one, eorts should
be made to
include representatives of all groups of future
users of the building in the design process: sta and pa
-
tients, which is possible – this is conrmed by the case stud-
ies cited in this article. Thus, it should be concluded that the
aim of the research work as stated in the introduction (statis-
tical methods can be an eective tool in assessing the spatial
needs of users at the stage of programming and designing an
investment) has been achieved.
This is borne out by the Evidence-Based Design process
in hospital design, i.e., making design decisions related to
the functional-spatial programme based on the results of re-
liable scientic research.
In terms of practical recommendations arising from this
research work, it is worth highlighting:
1.
The need to use nomenclature in the survey sheets that
is understandable to the recipient – depending on the re-
search: sta or patients. To this end, pilot surveys should be
carried out before the implementation of the targeted studies.
2. With regard to surveys involving hospital sta – when
formulating the survey, it is necessary to narrow its scope
to aspects relevant to the investment in question, so that the
survey does not involve long-term involvement of the sta,
who are likely to ll in the questionnaires during their work.
3. In relation to surveys with the participation of patients
– both the observations of this user group in relation to the
existing space and the expectations towards the space after
the implementation of the target design intervention (con-
struction, reconstruction or extension) should be considered
relevant.
4. When selecting the study group, particular attention
should be paid to ensure a minimum size, determined by the
formula indicated in chapter: “Case study of the use of sta-
tistical methods in research on designer participation with
hospital sta”.
At the same time, consideration should be given to lim-
iting access to the surveys to designated users only, which
will increase the condence level for the results.
Translated by
Agata Gawlak
References
Asanowicz, Aleksander. “Geneza metodologii projektowania.” Architec-
turae et Artibus 2, no. 4 (2010): 11–8.
Barełkowski, Robert. “Zapiski o procesie projektowym.” Przestrzeń
i Forma 12, (2009): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3219.4242.
Bieniek, Agnieszka, Emilia Bogacka, Ewa Filipczuk, Marta Kowalczyk,
Katarzyna Piętak, and Maciej Pilarski. Rocznik statystyczny woje-
wództwa wielkopolskiego. Urząd Statystyczny w Poznaniu, 2021.
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. “State of Health
in the EU, Polska, Prol systemu ochrony zdrowia 2021.” Pub-
lished December 13, 2021. Accessed January 20, 2022, at www.
oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/poland-coun-
try-health-prole-2021_e836525a-en.
Gawlak, Agata. Architektura szpitala: izba przyjęć w szpitalu pe dia t
rycz nym. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, 2019.
Graves, Michael. “Michael Graves at TEDMED 2011.” Video, 25 min.,
45 sec. Accessed June 6, 2024, at https://www.tedmed.com/talk/mi-
chael-graves-at-tedmed- 2011/.
Hegger, Manfred, Mathias Fuchs, Thomas Stark, and Martin Zeumer.
Energy Manual, Sustainable Architecture. Birkhauser, 2008.
Kruskal, William H., and Wilson A. Wallis. “Use of Ranks in One-Cri-
terion Variance Analysis.” Journal of the American Statistical Asso-
ciation 47, no. 260 (1952): 583–621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/016
21459.1952.10483441.
Kuszewski, Piotr, and Jarosław Podgórski. Statystyka, wzory i tablice.
Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie, 2008.
Lee, Jean S.K. “Quanitative Versus Qualitative Research Methods – Two
Approaches to Organization Studies.” Asia Pacic Journal of Ma na
ge ment 9, no. 1 (1992): 87–94, https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF
01732039.
Majerska-Pałubicka, Beata. Zintegrowane projektowanie architekto nicz
ne w kontekście zrównoważonego rozwoju. Doskonalenie procesu.
Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, 2014.
Mann, Henry, and Donald Ransom Whitney. “On a Test of Whether one
of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other.”
Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18, no. 1 (1947): 50–60. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491.
Niezabitowska, Elżbieta, ed. Wybrane elementy Facility Management
w architekturze. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, 2004.