î 3DîterrestrialîlaserîscanningîofîElîFuerteîdeîSamaipataââ/âNaziemneîlaseroweîskanowanieî3DîElîFuerteîdeîSamaipataî 33
The whole picture was reîżned by applying a negative
version of the black and white image obtained from the
âCloud Silhouetteâ algorithm.
It is noteworthy that the colour reproduction on the 3D
point cloud turned out to be close to the colours obtained
on uncalibrated digital photos from the îżeld (compare
Figs. 10A, B).
Conclusions and project limitations
The chosen method of documentation turned out to be
adequate for its purpose of providing the most accurate
reproduction of the surface of the Samaipata rock includ-
ing its smallest details. However, the resulting database
is so large (265 GB) that it requires computers with high
computing power, high-speed graphics cards, and a large
amount of RAM to operate it. We had an acceptable level
of work comfort when using a computer with two Xeon
processors (Intel
Âź
Xeon
Âź
CPU E5-2630 v2), 128 GB RAM,
and two NVIDIA GTX 1070 graphics cards.
The practical use of such a large and detailed scan da-
tabase brings problems. Assuming that the scanned area
measures only 80 Ă 240 m with an average scanning den-
sity of 3 Ă 3 mm, and assuming that the intention is to get
a full graphical representation of the entire area, we will
end up with a îżle size of 24 000 by 72 000 pixels (1728
megapixels). Using îżles of this size on a daily basis is not
convenient. However, this was not the purpose of scan-
ning with such a high density. The main value of this scan
database is that of a document that is a detailed (as far as
todayâs technical possibilities permit) representation of the
state of the monument at a speciîżc moment (July 2016).
In the next ten years it would be advisable to repeat,
if not a scan of the whole rock, then at least a scan of its
most important fragments. Comparison of data from the
two diî””erent periods would determine the speed of erosion
and indicate the places most exposed to it. The use of TLS
data for monitoring the state of heritage monuments is be-
coming increasingly common [16]â[19] and is particularly
worth recommending in the case of el Fuerte de Samaipata.
Referencesâ/Bibliografia
[1] KoĆciuk J., Modern 3D scanning in modelling, documentation
and conservation of architectural heritage, [in:] J. JasieĆko (ed.),
Structural analysis of historical constructions: proceedings of the
International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Con-
structions 2012, 15â17 October 2012, Vol. 1, DolnoĆlÄ
skie Wy-
dawnictwo Edukacyjne, WrocĆaw 2012, 64â76.
[2] Barber D.M., Dallas R.W., Mills J.P., Laser scanning for architec-
tural conservation, âJournal of Architectural Conservationâ 2006,
Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 35â52, doi: 10.1080/13556207.2006.10784959.
[3] Van Genechten B., Theory and Practice on Terrestrial Laser Scan-
ning: Training Material Based on Practical Applications, Univer-
sidad Politecnica de Valencia Editorial, Valencia 2008.
[4] Remondino F., Campana S., 3D Recording and modelling in ar-
chaeology and cultural heritage theory and best practices, BAR
international series, 2598, Archaeopress, Oxford 2014.
[5] Fiorillo F., Remondino F., Barba S. et al., 3Dîdigitizationîandîmap-
pingîofîheritageîmonumentsîandîcomparisonîwithîhistoricalîdraw-
ings, âThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote
Sensing and Spatial Information Sciencesâ 2013, Vol. II-5 W, 1,
133â138, doi: 10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W1-133-2013.
[6] Grussenmeyer P., Landes T., Voegtle T. et al., Comparison meth-
ods of terrestrial laser scanning, photogrammetry and tacheometry
data for recording of cultural heritage buildings, âThe Internation-
al Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial
Information Sciencesâ 2008, Vol. 36, 213â218.
[7] Kottke J., An Investigation of Quantifying and Monitoring Stone
Surface Deterioration Using Three Dimensional Laser Scanning,
Masterâs Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA,
2009, https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 1126
&context=hp_theses [accessed: 21.05.2019].
[8] RĂŒther H., Chazan M., Schroeder R. et al., Laser scanning for conser-
vation and research of African cultural heritage sites: The case study
ofî WonderwerkîCave,î Southî Africa, âJournal of Archaeological Sci-
enceâ 2009, Vol. 36, Iss. 1, 1847â1856, doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.04.012.
[9] Fabbri S., Sauro F., Santagata T. et al., High-resolution 3-D map-
ping using terrestrial laser scanning as a tool for geomorpholog-
ical and speleogenetical studies in caves: An example from the
Lessiniîmountainsî(NorthîItaly), âGeomorphologyâ 2017, Vol. 280,
16â29, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.12.001.
[10] Zhou K., Zhao X., Zhou J. et al., Application of terrestrial laser
scanning for heritage conservation in Yungang Grotto, âThe In-
ternational Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and
Spatial Information Sciencesâ 2008, Vol. 37, Part B5, 337â340.
[11] Lercari N., Monitoring Earthen Archaeological Heritage using
MultiTemporal Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Surface Change
Detection, âJournal of Cultural Heritageâ 2019, Vol. 39, 152â165,
doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2019.04.005.
[12] Remondino F., 3D recording for cultural heritage, [in:] D. Cowley
(ed.), Remote Sensing for Archaeological Heritage Management.
Proceedings of the 11
th
EAC Heritage Management Symposium,
25â27îMarchî2010,îReykjavĂk, Occasional Publication of the Aerial
Archaeology Research Group No. 3, Europae Archaeologia Consil-
ium (EAC), Brussels 2011, 107â116, doi: 10.1179/146195712X13
382850644938.
[13] Guarnieri A., Fissore F., Masiero A. et al., From Tls Survey To 3D
Solid Modeling for Documentation of Built Heritage: the Case
Study of Porta Savonarola in Padua, âThe International Archives
of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information
Sciencesâ 2017, Vol. XLII-2/W5, 303â308, doi: 10.5194/isprs-ar-
chives-XLII-2-W5-303-2017.
[14] Murtiyoso A., Grussenmeyer P., Documentation of heritage build-
ings using close-range UAV images: dense matching issues, com-
parison and case studies, âThe Photogrammetric Recordâ 2017,
Vol. 32, Iss. 159, 206â229, doi: 10.1111/phor.12197.
[15] Periodicî Reporting:î Aî Handbookî forî Siteî Managers,î Theî Worldî
Heritage Convention Third Cycle of Periodic Reporting 2018â2024,
2018, https://whc.unesco.org/en/periodicreporting/ [accessed:
22.08.2018].
[16] Guarnieri A., Milan N., Vettore A., Monitoring of Complex Structure
forîStructuralîControlîUsingîTerrestrialîLaserîScanningî(Tls)îandî
Photogrammetry, âInternational Journal of Architectural Heritageâ
2013, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 54â67, doi: 10.1080/15583058.2011.606595.
[17] Selbesoglu M.O., Bakirman T., Gokbayrak O., Deformation mea-
surement using terrestrial laser scanner for cultural heritage, âThe
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing
and Spatial Information Sciencesâ 2016, Vol. XLII-2/W1, 89â93,
doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W1-89-2016.
[18] Park H.S., Lee H.M., Adeli H. et al., AîNewîApproachîforîHealthî
Monitoring of Structures: Terrestrial Laser Scanning, âCompu ter-
Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineeringâ 2007, Vol. 22, Iss. 1,
19â30, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2006.00466.x.
[19] Tapete D., Casagli N., Luzi G. et al., Integrating radar and la-
ser-based remote sensing techniques for monitoring structural
deformation of archaeological monuments, âJournal of Archaeo-
logical Scienceâ 2013, Vol. 40, Iss. 1, 176â189, doi: 10.1016/j.jas.
2012.07.024.