112  Katarzyna Słuchocka
stimuli deepening perception and originating in the basic 
senses, as well as additional elements important in the ob-
servation process: analysis and interpretation (analysis of 
verbal interpretation). This in-depth analysis and reception 
of architectural space, taking place with the help of the 
interpretation of an architectural form (an interpretive im-
age and  a  verbal  comment),  can eectively increase the 
sensitivity and awareness of users of architectural spaces, 
strengthening the social identity and individuals. Expand-
ing the eld of interpretation and reception of architectural 
space with the sphere of sensual perception opens up new 
possibilities of interpretation and tightens distant areas of 
research, giving a new dimension to articulations and se-
mantics, treated as opinion-forming factors. It also implies 
further sets of data necessary for a factual  assessment of 
architectural  spaces.  An  in-depth  perception  process  is 
an investment in the shape of future architecture and the 
comfort of our existence, and the form and image set, sup-
plemented with a word, is proof of the necessity to expand 
the eld of activity in terms of recognizing architecture. 
The presented research methods, based on the analysis of 
representations  of  the  model  version  of  architecture,  its 
sensual  reception  and  interpretative  representation,  may 
facilitate  the  identication  of  the  right  way  of  creating 
architecture, ultimately consciously implicating the space 
intended  for  humans. As  Rasmussen  [28,  pp.  225–237] 
argued in his study, referring to the issues of acoustics 
in architecture, that architecture can be heard, it can also 
be assumed that poetic comments, which are a graphic 
complement to the image-photograph of architecture, are 
a cognitive tool helpful in its understanding and compre-
hending while the provoked  reinterpretation plays a  key 
role in the cognitive process of architecture.
In the presented research process, taking into account 
the method of image and semantic analysis, other forms, 
events or phenomena may also be the subject of studies. 
The  above-discussed  thematic  research  entitled  “An  ar-
chitectural object – a work of art, in the context of per-
ception processes” concerned only selected architectural 
forms. The survey and opinion-forming method planned 
for implementation will enable us to fully conrm the va-
lidity of the applied method.
Translated by
Kinga Uszko-Skrzypczak
References
  [1]  Mączyńska-Frydryszek A.,  Jaskólska-Klaus  M.,  Maruszewski T., 
Psychozjologia widzenia, Akademia Sztuk Pięknych w Poznaniu, 
Poznań 2001.
  [2]  Fitch J.M., The Aesthetics of Function, “Annals of the New York 
Academy of Sciences” 1965, Vol. 128, Iss. 2, 706–714, doi: 10.1111/ 
j.1749-6632.1965.tb11687.x.
  [3]  Bańka A.,  Architektura  psychologicznej  przestrzeni  życia.  Beha-
wioralne podstawy projektowania, Gemini-Print, Poznań 1999.
  [4]  Kozak P., Czym jest myślenie obrazami?, https://projekty.ncn.gov.pl/ 
opisy/313485-pl.pdf [accessed: 2.02.2022].
  [5]  Panofsky E., Studia z historii sztuki, PIW, Warszawa 1971.
  [6]  Tisdall C., Beuys declaration,  [in:]  N.  Rosenthal,  Ch.M.  Joachi-
mides (eds.), Art into Society – Society into Art: Seven German 
Artists, Institute of Contemporary Art, London 1974, 48.
  [7]  Boehm G., Was ist ein Bild?, Fink, München 1994.
  [8]  Boehm G., O obrazach i widzeniu. Antologia tekstów, Universitas, 
Kraków 2006.
  [9]  Pallasmaa J., Oczy skóry. Architektura i zmysły, Instytut Architek-
tury, Kraków 2012.
[10]  Wunenburger  J.-J.,  Filozoa  obrazów,  słowo/obraz/terytoria, 
Gdańsk 2011.
[11] 
 Mausfeld R., Intrinsic Multiperspectivity: Conceptual Forms and the 
Functional Architecture of the Perceptual System, [in:] W. Welsch, 
W. Singer, A. Wunder (eds.), Interdisciplinary  Anthro pology, Springer, 
Berlin–Heidelberg 2011, 19–54, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-11668-1_2.
[12]  Kłopotowska A., Niewidzialna architektura – status piękna w po-
zawzrokowej percepcji przestrzeni architektonicznej, “Czasopismo 
Techniczne. Architektura” 2007, R. 104, z. 6-A, 269–274.
[13]   
Al-Thahab A.A.L., Perception in architecture... A philosophical look, 
“Arab Scientic Heritage Journal” 2012, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 327–352. 
[14]  Frascari M., Eleven Exercises in the Art of Architectural Drawing, 
Slow Food for the Architect’s Imagination, Taylor & Francis, Lon-
don 2011.
[15]  Słuchocka K., Can architecture lie?, [in:] T. Kozłowski (red.), Den-
ing the architectural space – The truth and lie of architecture, V. 3, 
Ocyna Wydawnicza Atut  – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo  Oświa-
towe, Kraków 2020, 105–116.
[16]  Wolny-Zmorzyński K., Jaka informacja? Rzecz  o  percepcji foto-
grai dziennikarskiej, Wydawnictwo UJ, Kraków 2010.
[17]  Białus W., Efekt widzialności, Universitas, Kraków 2013.
[18]  Herbert Z., Mistrz  z  Delft, Fundacja Zeszytów Literackich, War-
szawa 2008.
[19]  Herbert Z., Węzeł gordyjski oraz inne pisma rozproszone, Bibliote-
ka Więzi, Warszawa 2001.
[20]  Cymer A., Sztuka z fantazji i kamienia: Zbigniew Herbert o archi  -
tekturze, Culture.pl, 2018, https://culture.pl/pl/artykul/sztuka-z
-fantazji-i-kamienia-zbigniew-herbert-o-architekturze [accessed: 
15.02.2022].
[21]  Zeler B., Wiersze katedralne Juliana Przybosia, [in:] T. Bujnicki, 
K. Heska-Kwaśniewicz (red.), O Julianie Przybosiu: wspomnienia, 
studia, szkice, UŚ, Katowice 1983, 121–133. 
[22]  Hume D., An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, Oxford 
University Press, Oxford, New York 2007.
[23] 
 Jażyński M., Hume, metafora mózgowa i myślenie życzeniowe, “Prze-
gląd Filozoczny – Nowa Seria” 2011, R. 20, nr 4(80), 393–406.
[24]   Wróbel S., Spór inżynierów: koneksjonizm a klasyczna architektu-
ra umysłu, “Przegląd Filozoczno-Literacki” 2003, nr 4, 131–161, 
http://www.p.uw.edu.pl/index.php/p/ article/view/111  [accessed: 
4.06.2022].
[25]  Schwartz R., Vision and Cognition in Picture Perception,“Phi-
losophy  and  Phenomenological  Research”  2001,  Vol.  62,  No.  3, 
707–719, doi: 10.2307/2653549. 
[26]  Jive’n G., Larkham P.J., Sense of Place, Authenticity and Charac-
ter: A Commentary, “Journal and Urban Design” 2003, Vol. 8, Iss. 
1, 67–81, doi: 10.1080/1357480032000064773.
[27]  Słuchocka K., Forma, obraz, słowo. Architektura/idea/sztuka, Wy-
dawnictwo PP, Poznań 2021.
[28]  Rasmussen S.E., Odczuwanie architektury, Wydawnictwo Mura-
tor, Warszawa 1999.
[29]   Słuchocka K., Świadomość i intuicja w procesie projektowym, [in:] 
A. Januchta-Szostak, M. Banach (red.), Architektura wobec wyz-
wań zrównoważonego rozwoju. Człowiek – Ekologia – Architektu-
ra, t. 2, Wydawnictwo PP, Poznań 2016.
[30]  Zumthor P., Myślenie architekturą, Karakter, Kraków 2010.