110 Elżbieta Komarzyńska-Świeściak
sion, as fusion creates new programs and performs best
with exible and variable programming. The main idea
behind the concept is that nodes, embedded in existing in-
frastructural networks, are ideal locations to realize mas-
sive programs.
After that study Monolab Architects researched several
similar test cases in Holland, such as infrabody ‘Compres-
sor Overschie’ (Fig. 7) and ‘A12 Long Term’ – long-term
view of the highway. These kinds of sites are difcult to
develop, but they force us to learn techniques of concen-
tration and intensication, the tools for urban planning
in the nearby future [9]. The projects proves that the ur-
banism is loaded with much more potential than we are
using these days and that concept, fusing infrastructure
and urban material with existing landscape, is the right
way of integrating metropolitan programs, especially in
cases where the visual presence of these programs is inap-
propriate or not wanted.
(Cross) programming the city
Bernard Tschumi in Event-cities [7] explores the re-
lationships between spaces and events. This is apparent
in the ‘unclassiable’ or ‘unprogrammed’ space found
in the gaps, margins, and in-between spaces included in
many of his later projects (Kansai Airport, le Fresnoy in
Tourcoingt). These are places in which an innite number
of unplanned events could take place, where life is not
exhaustively determined by functionalist architecture
dedicated to the proposition that there is only one set of
appropriate behaviours for a specic space. Representa-
tion is replaced by integration.
The same strategy could be used in the case of expo-
nential urbanism. Many empty and unused zones in con-
temporary cities can be heavily programmed in order to
ll the urban fabric with diversity and missing integrated
services. There is a huge potential in (cross) programming
these spaces as it could lead directly to higher efciency
and lower costs.
New contexts for architecture of contemporary city –
apart from physical (infrastructure layer, city roofs, etc.) –
are the cultural and sociological conditions like dynamic
and interlaced life patterns (living/working/leisure) mo-
bile and exible life style. Density (concentrated layouts
of functions) and integration/cooperation of previously
separated functions are the tools to deal with all these
contexts.
References
[1] Corner J., Scodio R., Designing the High Line: Gansevoort Street
to 30th Street, Friends of the High Line, Nowy Jork 2008.
[2] Jodidio P., Olympic Sculpture Park, [in:] Green Architecture Now!,
Taschen, Köln 2008.
[3] Koolhaas R., S, M, L, XL, Monacelli Press, USA, 1998, p. 969.
[4] Ouroussoff N., Gardens in the Air Where the Rail Once Ran, New
York Times, 12.08.2004.
[5] Tajima M., The city a playground, [in:] Nova Terra – Jaargang 5,
2005, No. 1, pp. 35–39.
[6] Tschumi B., Architecture and Disjunction, Cambridge: The Mas-
sachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1996.
[7] Tschumi B., Event-cities, Cambridge, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Lon-
don: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1994.
[8] van Kuilenburg J.W., Infrabodies, ARCH+, No. 147, August 1999,
pp. 67–73.
[9] van Kuilenburg J.W., Infrabodies, [in:] Monolab texts – the green
booklet, Monolab Architects, Rotterdam 2010.
Przekraczanie granic. Nowe konteksty architektury w dobie procesu zagęszczania się miast
Fragmentacja miasta, tzw. ‘urban growth’ i zapotrzebowanie na
projektowanie budynków o elastycznym i multifunkcjonalnym programie
prowadzą do tego, że architektura współczesnych miast musi się mierzyć
z nowym rodzajem kontekstu. Terytorium architektury rozszerza się na
węzły komunikacyjne, poprzemysłowe tereny, otoczenia autostrad, par-
kingi i przejścia podziemne, mosty i wiadukty, dachy i ściany istniejących
budynków, torowiska kolejowe, etc. Na podstawie wybranych realizacji
i koncepcji w artykule przeanalizowano zależności między architekturą
a takim nietypowym „agresywnym” kontekstem.
Key words: exponential urbanism, crossing boundaries Słowa kluczowe: zagęszczanie miast, przekraczanie granic