34  Jacek Kuśmierski, Katarzyna Hodor
took into account the prevailing winter temperatures and 
relative humidity [12]. Another typology was developed by 
Jan Łebkowski in his 1937 work on greenhouses [13], in 
which he distinguished a number of structures for the cul-
tivation of exotic plants, taking into account the structure’s 
construction, the environmental conditions inside, and the 
types of plants grown in them. Contemporary researchers 
have so far distinguished between historical orangeries and 
greenhouses by considering three criteria such as the time 
of construction, the form and layout of the interiors and the 
aforementioned plant types [14]–[16]. The state of their 
preservation has only been studied for the Lublin Voivode-
ship [17], [18]. No publication to date has presented a com-
prehensive attempt to valorise the surviving structures in 
Poland. This study aims to ll this gap concerning three key 
issues, i.e. typology, conservation status and valorisation.
The aim of this paper is to present the results of the rst 
cross-sectional study of historical orangeries and green-
houses in Poland. In the rst part of the paper, the identi-
ed orangeries and greenhouses are reviewed in terms of 
location, types of spatial units and dimensions, and their 
footprint. The analytical section then presents the results 
of typological studies, conservation status and valorisa-
tion. The conclusions summarise the key ndings and fea-
ture the directions for further research.
Materials and methods
The subject investigated involved the use of indepth 
historical analysis and a multiple-case study of each or-
angery  and  greenhouse  site.  Comparative  analysis  was 
used to approximate the typological changes that took 
place in orangery buildings in Poland with reference to the 
state of the art in the rest of Europe. The cultural heritage 
from the selected group of preserved sites was valorised 
according to a set of predetermined indicators.
Data on existing historical orangeries and greenhouses 
in Poland came from voivodeship monument registers, the 
Map Portal of the National Institute of Cultural Heritage 
[19] and the registration cards of architectural and civil 
engineering, the so-called green and white cards stored in 
the archives of voivodeship monument conservation oc-
es. These sources contain the most uptodate and reliable 
information,  allowing  objective  research  and  analysis. 
Supplementary material was obtained from contemporary 
cadastral maps, aerial photographs (orthophotos), the lite -
rature, online sources and eld research.
Due  to  the  study’s  subject  and  spatial  scope,  the  re-
search was carried out in three phases, using several dif-
ferent  methods. The  rst  stage  involved  identifying  the 
stock of existing historical orangeries and greenhouses in 
Poland. After a review of the abovementioned materials, 
165 sites were identied for which starting data was col-
lated and divided into three groups. The rst data group 
includes the exact location (voivodeship, county, town), 
the type of location and type of building. The second data 
group includes the ownership, the current use, the spatial 
unit in which they are located, the form and the material 
of which they are constructed. The last group of data con-
cerned the date of construction, the architectural style, the 
designer and builder, essential dimensions and the foot   
print. The results were then analysed statistically and ty-
pologically by structural system, material, form, time of 
construction and the architectural style of the buildings.
The second stage of the study “involved” an analysis 
and interpretation of the data collected using the case 
study method and architectural and conservation investi-
gation. On this basis, the state of preservation of histori-
cal orangeries and greenhouses in Poland was determined, 
with particular emphasis on their structural systems, interi-
or form and equipment for growing and displaying plants, 
or heating and water systems.
In  the  nal  stage,  valorisation  of  the  orangeries  and 
greenhouses was done using an original rating method 
with ratings given in three criteria. The rst is authentic-
ity (the degree of preservation of the original historical 
substance) and integrity (completeness of surviving ele-
ments of the structure): original equipment, interior and 
construction (3 points); original interior and construction 
(2 points); original construction (1 point); none (0 points). 
The second is the current use of the building: palm house, 
orangery, greenhouse (3 points); church, hospital, hous-
ing, commercial, culture and education (2 points); out-
building (1 point); ruin (0 points). The  nal  criterion  is 
age, dened as the century in which the building was con-
structed: 18
th
 century (3 points); 19
th
 century (2 points); 
20
th
 century (1 point). On this basis, valorisation of the 
surveyed structures was carried out on a fourlevel scale:
1. High (9–7 points) – a complete structure, restored, 
with fully intact furnishings and xtures, used to winter 
and exhibit plants.
2. Highmedium (6–4 points) – a structure subjected to 
adaptive reuse, which retains most original structural ele-
ments, often adapted or stripped of its original equipment, 
with its current use dierent than the original.
3. Lowmiddle (3–2 points) – a structure that is dilapi-
dated but that retains essential structural elements, in poor 
technical condition, stripped of its original furnishings 
or signicantly remodelled, with its current use dierent 
than the original.
4. Low (1 point) – a structure that is de facto a ruin, 
with only trace amount of surviving original structural el-
ements, stripped of its furnishings and abandoned.
Results and discussion
A total of 165 orangeries and greenhouses entered in 
the register of monuments in 15 of Poland’s 16 voivode-
ships  were  identied.  The  highest  number  of  structures 
was found in the south-western and south-eastern areas 
of the country. In terms of numbers, the Lower Silesian 
Voivodeship came rst, with 35 structures, and the Sub-
carpathian Voivodeship  came  second,  with  20. A  dozen 
or so sites each are located in the Masovian Voivodeship 
–  19,  the  Greater  Poland  Voivodeship  –  15,  the  Lublin 
Voivodeship – 14, the Lubusz Voivodeship – 14 and the 
Lesser Poland Voivodeship – 11. The voivodeships with 
only a few structures each included the Warmian-Masurian 
Voivodeship – 9, the Łódź Voivodeship – 7, the Kuyavian
Pome ra
   
nian Voivodeship – 6, the Opole Voivodeship – 4,