24 $OHNVDQGUDàXNDV]HZLF]
LQWKHGHYHORSPHQWSROLFLHVLQ&RSHQKDJHQDQG:URFáDZ
as well as the differences in approach to the general prin-
FLSOHVRIWUDI¿FRUJDQL]DWLRQWKHDQDO\VLVRIWKHVHFWLRQV
of the streets shall demonstrate the differences in the street
space management. In order to classify the streets the fol-
ORZLQJXUEDQGHVLJQFDWHJRULHVZHUHGH¿QHGZKLFKZHUH
XVHGLQIXUWKHUDQDO\VHVORFDWLRQ±FORVHSUR[LPLW\RIWKH
FHQWHUPDUNHWVTXDUHURDGFODVVLQWKHKLHUDUFK\RIURDG
QHWZRUN±PDLQURDGSUHVHQFHRIF\FOLQJLQIUDVWUXFWXUH
width. The comparison of similar street sections in the
centers of different cities is the introduction to the analysis
allowing for the detection of differences and similarities in
the structure of the cities and their urban design solutions
taking into account the cycling infrastructure. The main
streets located close to the center due to their representa-
tive and communication character were selected for this
purpose.
:LWKWKRVHDVVXPSWLRQV.D]LPLHU]D:LHONLHJR6WUHHW
in its section with the segregated bike lane was chosen
LQ:URFáDZ7KH VWUHHW PHHWLQJ WKRVH FULWHULD ZDV +DQV
Christian Andersen Boulevard which was chosen in Co-
penhagen.
The Andersen Boulevard ranks high among the streets
as it connects the very center with the south and north dis-
tricts as well as it goes right next to the market square with
WKH FLW\ KDOO7KH %RXOHYDUG LV DERXW P ZLGH WKDW LV
DERXWPZLGHUWKDQ.D]LPLHU]D:LHONLHJR6WUHHWE\WKH
Europeum Hotel. Copenhagen has a subway system which
LQWKHFLW\FHQWHUJRHVXQGHUJURXQGWKXVVDYLQJSUHFLRXV
area on the ground. The infrastructure of the street has six
ODQHVWKUHHHDFKGLUHFWLRQDVHSDUDWHODQHIRUEXVHVDQGD
wide bikeway.
The bus lane protects the cyclists against cars. On the
RWKHUVLGH RI WKHVWUHHWWKHUH LV7LYROL$PXVHPHQW 3DUN
WKDWKDVDWUDI¿FFDOPHGVHUYLFHODQHIRUERWKF\FOLVWVDQG
cars. It is separated from the roadway by a wide curb facil-
itating safe getting in the car. Additionally the service lane
provides a pull-over area for buses and a parking space
IRUFXUE SDUNLQJ,WV HQG PHUJHVWKHPDLQ WUDI¿FVWUHDP
DQGSURYLGHVDVDIHFRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKHELNHZD\)LJ
presents the street section.
7KHVWUHHW LQ:URFáDZLV VOLJKWO\GLIIHUHQW$OWKRXJK
cycling changes have been implemented relatively recent-
O\ WKH\VKRXOGJXDUDQWHHWKHPLQLPXPOHYHORI FRPIRUW
DQGVDIHW\7KHH[DPSOHRI.:LHONLHJR6WUHHWLVUDWKHU
controversial and the cycling infrastructure appeared when
the pedestrian crossing was built by the Museum Nation-
al. A bike lane was separated on the south section from
6ąGRZQLF]D6WUHHWWRĝZLGQLFND6WUHHWDWWKHH[SHQVHRI
one car lane. The bikeway was segregated from the high
VSHHGWUDI¿FE\DPHWHUZLGHSDLQWHGLVODQG7KLVLVDUDWK-
er effective solution and the drivers do not drive on it so
the cyclists are safe. More problems appear at the moment
when the bike lane ends and the cyclist must go onto the
car lane. This place is marked neither for cyclists nor for
car drivers. Cyclists either stop and wait for the cars to
drive by or go onto the lane parallel to the cars without
KDQGVLJQDOV)LJSUHVHQWVWKHVWUHHWVHFWLRQ
There is an advanced bicycle stop line at the pedestrian
crossing by the museum. This solution is very popular in
*UHDW%ULWDLQDQG,UHODQG7KHVWRSER[SURYLGHVDSODFH
WRVWRSIRUDQXPEHURIF\FOLVWVLQIURQWRIWUDI¿FOLJKWVVR
that drivers can see them. The problem with the stop box
LQ:URFáDZLVWKDWWKHF\FOLVWVGRQRWNQRZKRZWRXVHLW
7KHVWRSER[LVRIWHQFRQIXVHGZLWKWKHELNHFURVVLQJ8Q-
IRUWXQDWHO\WKDWLQYHVWPHQWGLGQRWWDNHLQWRDFFRXQWWKH
ELF\FOHWUDI¿FLQWKHRSSRVLWHGLUHFWLRQ
The analysis of that simple comparison of the street
sections connected with the information gathered during
on-site visits leads to a number of interesting conclusions.
The width of the streets is comparable. It cannot be said
WKDWLQ:URFáDZWKHUHLVQRURRPIRUF\FOLQJLQIUDVWUXFWXUH
RUWKDWWUDI¿FODQHVDUHWRRQDUURZ(YHU\WKLQJGHSHQGVRQ
JRRGZLOORIRI¿FLDOVDQGURDGHQJLQHHUV
:URFáDZKDVELJSODQVUHJDUGLQJEXLOGLQJDGHTXDWHSR-
VLWLRQRIWKHELF\FOHLQWKHWUDI¿FKLHUDUFK\7KHSUREOHPLV
LQUDLVLQJVXI¿FLHQWIXQGVIRUWKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIWKRVH
plans. It is very good that the city is trying to improve its
cycling environment whenever it is possible. That invest-
ment would be much more effective and impressive for the
inhabitants if for instance it would have been made later
but on both sides of the street and all the way to the junc-
tion with Szewska Street.
This is the least invasive solution that does not disturb
the motorized space – hatched. The 1.8 m wide bikeway
was designed in the grass lane along the sidewalk. It is not
an important element due to the composition or aesthet-
LFVFKDUDFWHURIWKHSODFH7KHSHGHVWULDQWUDI¿FLVQRWWRR
heavy on the sidewalk itself as it attracts little activity and
few services. This is a self-contained solution – a compre-
KHQVLYHGHVLJQIRUWKDWVSHFL¿FURDGVHFWLRQ
:URFáDZDSSOLHVDORWRIF\FOLQJLPSURYHPHQWVKRZHY-
HUWKHNQRZOHGJHLQWKDWUHVSHFWOHDYHVPXFKWREHGHVLUHG
7KHF\FOLVWVRIWHQGRQRWNQRZWKHURDGWUDI¿FUHJXODWLRQV
DQG FDQQRW XVH WKH F\FOLQJ LQIUDVWUXFWXUH8QIRUWXQDWHO\
the city does not have funds for promotion campaigns.
Conclusion
The development of utility cycling in the city as an
important component of the city transportation system
is nothing new. Many European cities have started to de-
velop that alternative means of transportation a long time
ago. Each of the cities apply their own solutions to the
WHFKQLFDOSUREOHPVDGMXVWLQJWKHLUF\FOLQJLQIUDVWUXFWXUH
to the urban design. Some cities impose numerous restric-
tions on driving cars around the city centers by increas-
LQJWKHQXPEHURIVSHHGOLPLW]RQHVOD\LQJRXWRQHZD\
VWUHHWVDFFHVVLEOHWRF\FOLVWVGHFUHDVLQJWKHQXPEHURIFDU
SDUNLQJORWVRUE\VLJQL¿FDQWO\LQFUHDVLQJWKHFRVWRISDUN-
ing in the city center. Some cities have worked out a com-
promise including the solutions consisting in sharing the
VSDFHE\SHGHVWULDQVF\FOLVWVDQGFDUV6RPHFLWLHVRIIHU
their inhabitants such conditions that getting around by car
is simply unattractive and they choose the bicycle or pub-