82 Bartosz M. Walczak
results, when confronted with the actual condition of the
object, force us to look for solutions that would tell the
history of a property in the best possible way to the con-
temporary society.
At the same time, due to its specic history, the build-
ing, despite being part of the industrial heritage, is free
from negative associations caused by deindustrialization
and economic decline. The intimate scale of the building
also means that it is not aected by many threats typical
of degraded post-industrial properties.
Due to the irretrievable loss of function, the protection
of post-industrial buildings requires their adaptive reuse to
an incomparably greater extent than in the case of other
types of monuments. Activities of this kind can signicant-
ly contribute to the renewal (revitalization) of crisis areas,
a phenomenon characteristic of former industrial districts.
The problem task presented in this article made it pos-
sible to test the eectiveness of selected design strategies
that would allow us not only to preserve the memory of
the buildings that once existed in Wójtowski Młyn, im-
portant for the history of the city both in pre-industrial
times and in the period of industrialization. Design should
therefore be treated as a research process leading to a new
interpretation of the site. In this approach, architectural
creation must be subordinated to the extraction and expo-
sure of identied cultural values. Since only “scraps” have
survived from the particular stages of the construction his-
tory, architectural solutions were needed that would bind
them together and, at the same time, be an eective tool
for telling stories from the palimpsestic past.
Based on the analysis of the identied approaches and
interpretations, the following observations can be made:
– choosing a leitmotif symbolizing the original func-
tion draws the recipient’s attention to the fact that the buil-
ding was something else than its architectural form sugge-
sts, but it does not fully refer to the complex history of the
place (it is more an anecdote than a story),
– creating an architecture that takes into account all
phases of transformation is a dicult task, but possible
to carry out provided that the narrative is well structured
(just like any complex, multi-threaded story),
– narration in architecture requires the appropriate se-
lection of forms and materials (e.g. reecting the state of
knowledge about the various stages of construction histo-
ry), and in addition, it should be understandable (and at-
tractive) for the contemporary recipient,
– it is especially dicult for young architects to be re-
strained and to understand that it is the subject of the story,
not the narrator, that should be at the centre of attention,
– the role of interpretation is of fundamental importan-
ce for the understanding of the object and the recognition
of its value by the contemporary recipient,
– the narrative must be adapted to the rank of the histo-
ric object and the available means, and consequently take
various forms.
In addition to issues strictly related to the narrative, the
discussed projects also revealed several problems essen-
tial for the eective interpretation of monuments, espe-
cially those belonging to industrial heritage.
First of all, it is signicant that, apart from the water
wheel technology, the engineering aspect of heritage has
been omitted, which is, however, problematic not only in
Poland but almost everywhere in the world [16], [17].
Secondly, preserving the genius loci turns out to be
a particularly dicult design challenge. The atmosphere
of the place is ephemeral and dicult to capture and
translate into architectural language. Moreover, changes
can easily destroy it. Architects must show the appropri-
ate sensitivity to successfully design solutions that respect
the atmosphere of a place with a high concentration of
cultural values.
Another important issue is adaptive reuse. It is of cru-
cial importance for monuments to be socially useful be-
cause emotional bonds are built through everyday contact.
It is equally important to present a technical monument in
such a way that its original function is understandable for
those who interact with the heritage. While most people
can easily imagine how a baroque palace or even a medi-
eval castle functioned in the past, members of post-indus-
trial societies are usually helpless when it comes to indus-
trial facilities. It is dicult to appreciate a monument that
is not understood. Therefore, in the case of sites related
to production or technology, interpretation explaining the
process determining the appearance of a historic object is
of particular importance. It is also worth explaining other
issues that allow for a better understanding of the monu-
ment and its embedded system of meanings.
To sum up, the architectural narrative concerning cul-
tural heritage can take various forms, which was perfectly
demonstrated by the discussed projects, whose authors af-
ter graduation will hopefully be better prepared to perpet-
uate the memory of (not only) industrial heritage.
Translated by
Anetta Kępczyńska-Walczak
References
[1]
Dillon S., Reinscribing De Quincey’s palimpsest: the signicance
of the palimpsest in contemporary literary and cultural studies,
“Textual Practice” 2005, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, 243–263, doi: 10.1080/
09502360500196227.
[2] Palimpsest, [in:] Słownik języka polskiego, PWN, https://sjp.pwn.pl/
szukaj/palimpsest.html [accessed: 7.03.2023].
[3] Wierzbicka A.M., Architektura jako narracja znaczeniowa, Ocyna
Wydawnicza PW, Warszawa 2013.
[4] Niezabitowski A., Narracja architektoniczna – interpretacje, speku-
lacje czy fakty empiryczne?, “Kwartalnik Architektury i Urbanisty-
ki” 2016, t. 61, z. 1, 5–30.